Ex-Cop Kills His Girlfriend and His Unborn Child
Bobby Cutts a former cop was charged with the crime of killing his unborn child and his girlfriend, Jessie Davis. Bobby Cutts is sentenced to the death penalty. He was sentenced to death because of killing his unborn child. The juror was astonished by him apologizing to the family of Jessie. Bobby said, “It was a nightmare that will continue to haunt me for the rest of my days.” Bobby teared up when his mother talked about his childhood at his sentencing hearing. Bobby is an African-American and his jury is all white. This jury is the same jury that sentenced him to the death penalty. Bobby has a chance at not going to the death penalty but instead will be in prison for life. There also could be the possibility of parole for 20, 25 or 30 years. Bobby’s sister, father and teachers from his high school all testified during the trial. Bobby’s mother, Renee, was the first witness called to the stand. Renee talked about how her son was a good youngster and was very active in sports, Boy Scouts and at his church. Renee was completely shocked that her son was capable of such a crime. Bobby’s teacher describes Bobby as a very good student. Bobby was very social and helpful to all the kids in his class. The teacher also said that he could never see good old Bobby doing something like this. Bobby told the jury that all of this was just an accident. He said that his girlfriend was moving too slowly while getting Blake, Bobby’s and Jessie’s 2 ½ year old son, ready to go out. Bobby said that Jessie was pulling on him trying to stop him from leaving them, when Bobby accidentally hit Jessie in the throat with his elbow. Bobby told the jury that he tried to perform CPR on her body. He also said that he used bleach to try to revive her. The prosecutors said that he was making excuses for his actions. They stated he was trying to think of a way to get out of paying for child support. This they believed was the reason he killed his girlfriend and unborn child. I think that the prosecutors are a little too harsh and that he didn’t mean to kill her. I think that the bleach is a little suspicious and they need to look into that a little more. Also, it seems a little strange that a jury, which is made up of one’s peers, was all white. Out of twelve people not even one person belonged to another ethnic group. These are my opinions and it will be interesting to see what else happens in this case. I found two points of views on this article. One point of view I found was from BBC.com. Another point of view I found was from CNN.com. It seems that the BBC article was less detailed about the crime. I liked the CNN article better because it was more descriptive and had more of a neutral view side.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/02/25/cutts.trial/index.html http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6238264.stm
- Seb Beltran
March 1, 2008 at 9:59 pm
I have to disagree with you. I think he is guilty. The is a little wierd how his jury was all white. Im with the jury on this one though. I think he did it to get out of child support. Bleach? How can you revive somone with bleach? Hey you never know. It will be interesting to see what happenes in this case.
March 3, 2008 at 12:01 am
This was a very interesting yet familiar story. We hear about unfair trials like this all the time, even though in our consitution is says something like “a fair and speedy trial” ha! Its more than unfair that this black man had a jury of all white men. Couldnt he at least get some racial variation?
But I will agree that the bleech thing is a tad bit suspicious. That doesn’t sound right at all. From what I can see, it sounds like it may have been an accident. And if he elbowed her in the throat hard enough it would make sense that she would die. I think his sentencing seems a little harsh, and it makes me wonder would his sentence of been easier if he was of a different ethnic background????
March 3, 2008 at 4:24 am
I do agree that it is interesting that the jury is composed of all white males. However, I do not think they will discriminate against him for being an African American. The bleach story, to me, sounds a bit suspicious and I only hope he gets the sentence he truly deserves.
March 14, 2008 at 5:46 pm
I partly agree with you. The fact that he is showing remorse should
March 18, 2008 at 2:27 am
i partly agree with you. the fact that he is showing remorse should compinsate for his supposedly accidental actions. but, how do you revive someone with bleach? anyway, i think that maybe the jury is showing a little discrimination to this african american male. i think maybe they should have another trial, but this time with a more ethnically diverse jury. i like how you compared the two articles from the two sources, good job. :]